Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

RodHammerBoy - keep it clean! Remember we're talking about a PRINCE here.

However I must admit the smut factor appeals to me. Harry's partying ways and drinking/drugging scandals only makes my appetite even more "wet". And digging deeper, I've heard rumors for years about his father, Prince Charles, having the most massive of tools. (enhanced by his slightly horse-like facial structure). I wonder ... like father, like son?

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Prince_Harry_2
Those rumors about Harry being sired by Diana's lover make him all the hotter as far as I'm concerned. That delicate flavor of illicitness, scandal, impure royal bloodlines, buried family secrets .... so "Dynasty" !! But Buckingham Palace certainly would block any paternity investigation. Besides, I read somewhere that Diana's ex-lover (her riding instructor?) denies fatherhood, naturally.

[This message was edited by Luxury Lex on 12-10-02 at 09:58 AM.]
Last edited {1}
Oh you're right Randella. I'll give the girl a break and focus on the positive. (think he's got a thing for shaved heads??) And look how HOT he looks in that photo - flawless. I like how his cheeks get red. Like his dutiful and more serious brother, Harry's got the looks, money and title but without all the heir-to-the-throne headaches William has to endure. (Diana used to call him her "spare" ... isn't that cute?)

You can see the beginnings of a freak and a total mess in that gorgeous face of his. tasty!
Last edited {1}
I'd give Harry a 'honey trap' he'd never forget ...

quote:

PAPERS REVEAL HARRY 'HONEY TRAP' PLOT

St James's Palace has refused to comment on newspaper reports of a "bizarre plot" to obtain a sample of Prince Harry's DNA.

A girl was going to be used to set a "honey trap" and pluck a strand of hair from his head, according to the Mail on Sunday and The Sunday Times.

The newspapers report that Prince Charles's private secretary Sir Michael Peat was tipped off about the elaborate sting and contacted police.

Scotland Yard refused to comment but police sources say they have received no complaint and no investigation is under way.

Both newspapers say Sir Michael may have believed that the News of the World was involved in the plot but the newspaper issued a denial.

Stuart Kuttner, managing editor, said: "The allegation that we would attempt to obtain a sample of Prince Harry's hair is utterly preposterous.

"We did not do this, never attempted to do this and it has never crossed our minds to do so."

He went on: "If this is the approach Sir Michael Peat is adopting in his investigation into sleaze at the Palace, we can only assume he'll find everyone guilty - regardless of any evidence.

"The whole notion is bonkers. Tom Crone, the legal manager of News International, publishers of the News of the World, formally told him so in the plainest of terms today.

"It's a pity Sir Michael chooses to think otherwise."

Story filed: 00:01 Sunday 15th December 2002

Last edited {1}

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×